Coal Saver Black

Product Information

There are basically two kinds of load that exists in every house: one that is resistive like incandescent lamps, heaters etc. and the other that’s capacitive or inductive like ACs, refrigerators, computers, etc.

Even Alibaba has no words about him. He said that alibaba is scam and didn’t protect his benefit. In fact, for the whole process, alibaba is protecting the benefit of customers. We have all proof to show it.However, during the communication with alibaba, his attitude and words didn’t stand right,so,he failed. And now he can only say bad words about Jumbo as revenge. Power Factor Correction for residential customers (home owners) is a scam? At most, each unit is worth as an investment. Power factor correction does make sense for some commercial / industrial customers. The power factor of a Resistive Load like toaster or ordinary incandescent light bulb is 1 (one). Devices with coils or capacitors (like pumps, fans and florescent light bulb ballasts)-Reactive Load have power factors less than one. When the power factor is less than 1, the current and voltage are out of phase. This is due to energy being stored and released into inductors (motor coil) or capacitors on every AC cycle (usually 50 or 60 times per second). And certainly not in the way the manufacturers recommend that they be installed, that is, permanently connecting them at the main panel. Doing that drags the power factor capacitive when the inductive motors are off and could create some real problems with ringing voltages.

Product Questions

Since a resistive load does not carry a PF so there is not any issue regarding filtering of Voltage and Current, So Power = Voltage X Current. If you really want to be headache, just try to do business with him. I do believe that he got lots of bad buying history in China. And you will be 100% unhappy. First Term is kilowatt (kW) and it represents Real power. Real power can perform work. Utility meters on the side of House measure this quantity (Real Power) and Power Company charge for it. A further complication is that if you install the “KVAR” unit at the fuse panel, it does nothing for the heat losses except for the two feet of huge wire between the fuse panel and the utility meter. Many KVAR units are marketed as boxes that you install at a single location.

I believe your comments here are nothing more than a smear campaign of Mr Sun for expression of his opinions only.In the second expression we clearly show that a reduction in current consumption by the refrigerator, but interestingly in both the above cases, the Real Power remains the same, i.e. the refrigerator continues to consume 100 watts, and therefore the utility bill remains the same. This simply proves that although the PF correction done by an energy saver may decrease the Amperage of the appliances, it can never bring down their power consumption and the electric Bill amount. If as he said, Jumbo power saver is scam. Then how to prove that his words is true ? Jumbo saver is PF correction device with Kvar capacitors and we have lots of saving examples to show customers. How can Mr.Sun that there is saving by other Kvar savers while there is no saving by Jumbo? If he really know about this tech, then he shouldn’t say it like this. A shorting circuit will, of course, carbonise the shorting and arcing points but these cannot be removed by improving circuit conditions, only prevented. Many people who have used these power savers said that they could reduce their electricity bills with the devices; however the reduction was not as much as they had expected. Moreover, they could not figure out if the reduction in electricity bills was due to the power savers or because of their efforts to reduce their electrical usage. There have been several serious discussions about the genuineness of the device.

It is known that the electricity that comes to our homes is not stable in nature. There are many fluctuations, raise and falls, and surges/Spikes in this current. This unstable current cannot be used by any of the household appliances. Moreover, the fluctuating current wastes the electric current from the circuit by converting electrical energy into heat energy. only power saver 3 phases with a kvar capacitor and controller Power factor, c/k and more can true save, depends the inductives load. if good for hotels or place use for sample many air conditioner. here can get good result saving.Let us try to study Household’s Reactive-Resistive Electrical Load and Voltage Spike Characteristic by example. 1. Power Saver in Reactive Load of Home This would improve the power so well that the overall consumption would be reduced by nearly a half.

Personally,, if you want to do this, calculate (or have a knowlegable friend do it) what size capacitor(s) is/are needed, then place this new unit in line between pump and power source and switch it automatically (relay or solid state relay) so that it is only online when motor is actually running. Keep in mind that 1 hp is approximately 750 watts plus motor inefficiency. Capacitor will level out the surges but won’t save money because residences are billed by kilowatt usage only. Also, due to the way ac voltage and current flow operate, the capacitor will raise your average voltage, perhaps higher than the motor is designed for. Home pool filters usually do not truly need 1 hp so there will be more inefficiency due to this than power factor correction. Manufacturers use one hp so that they can use one filter/pump assembly for most pool sizes that they make. You may save more if you install it on wire one guage size larger than spec’d – especially if the wire length is close to or over 100 ft.Second, the only potential for real power savings would occur if the product were only put near in the circuit while a reactive load (such as a motor) were running, and taken out of the circuit when the motor is not running. This is impractical, given that there are several motors in a typical home that can come on at any time (refrigerator, air conditioner, HVAC blower, vacuum cleaner, etc.), but the Power Saver itself is intended for permanent, unattended connection near the house breaker panel. Further, the author dies not state this system doesn’t work but states that as long as the system is in operation at, and only at, the same time as the capacitive and motorised loads and to only the extent required, then it will work very well, but the system doesn’t reduce the billing on power consumption for industry effectively enough to outweigh implementation costs EFFECTIVELY and to not affect household billing at all since households are not charged in the sane way as industry given that industrial machines are penalised as being the CAUSE of the “dirty signal” in mains electricity.