Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Product Information

The RX 5600 XTis based on AMD’s Navi architecture. It has 2304 Cores running at 1130MHz. It has a generous 6GB Memory that is decent enough for 1080p gaming.

Right off the bat we have Cinebench R20 multi results, and the margins you see here will translate to any application that can utilize 6 cores or more: basically any video editing tool, 3D rendering application, code compiler, and so on. We found that, in general, more cores do provide better performance in professional tools and when running multiple applications simultaneously.

Cache

Hitman 2 typically isn't a great title for Ryzen CPUs, the 3rd gen Ryzen 7 3700X falls short of even the Core i7-7700K for example. However, this title also requires more than 4 threads. In the case of the 7700K it skates by thanks to Hyper-Threading support. The 7600K though struggles and it's the exact same story with the 9100F, the game is still playable and relatively smooth, but the 1600 AF does have a clear advantage here. Battlefield V is even more demanding that Assassin's Creed: Odyssey and here frame stuttering is a massive problem with the quad-core chip. There is a 137% performance disparity between the 1% low and average frame rate with the 9100F, while we only see a 38% disparity with the 1600 AF. Its price to performance ratio is excellent. It beats the RTX 2060 in almost all games in terms of raw FPS. Far Cry New Dawn isn't a CPU demanding game, at least not in the sense that it utilizes core heavy CPUs very well. However, we include this title deliberately as it's a good example of how some older titles behave with modern processors.

Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details.

Số lõi

It's total annihilation in Blender as well. Here the 1600 AF was 85% faster than the 9100F. Again it makes more sense, at least in terms of performance, to compare the Ryzen 5 part with the Core i7-8700K, as it was just 13% slower in this test. It has a two-fan cooling system that works properly. The temperatures are maintained at optimal levels without generating any noise. Lihat http://ipt.intel.com/ untuk mengetahui jenis sistem yang mendukung Intel® Identity Protection Technology (Intel® IPT).

This begs the question, why were Intel fans claiming the 9100F would dust the 1600 AF, when in that very review we included Core i5-7600K results? Whatever the case, today we're putting them head to head in an effort to determine which budget CPU you should invest in. The RTX 2060 Superis a power-efficient graphics card. It has a TDP rating of 175W for which a 600W power supply should be decent enough. It has a two-fan cooling system that offers you excellent cooling. Finally we have the Total War: Three Kingdoms results and again, the 1600 AF edged out the 9100F, this time allowing for 10% more frames on average and a 23% improvement in 1% low performance.For playing games on a budget CPU, first up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. This game punishes quad-cores and as you'd expect, the 9100F fairs no better than the 7600K. Granted we're still looking at playable performance with the quad-cores, but frame stuttering will be much more apparent with these CPUs.