Intel Xeon E5-2697V2 CPU (2.7GHz, 12 Core, 24 Threads, 30MB Cache, LGA

Product Information

http://www.intel.com/content/www/th/th/architecture-and-technology/hyper-threading/hyper-threading-technology.html?wapkw=hyper+threading สำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมรวมถึงรายละเอียดว่ามีโปรเซสเซอร์ใดบ้างที่สนับสนุน Intel® HT Technology Windows is Windows, and it will not magically challenge Unix or OpenVMS, in some iterations later."

The three dies are aimed at workstations/enthusiasts, servers and high performance computing respectively. I’m not going to repeat what Johan already posted, but it is a really good read if you have a chance to look through it. Well, it's best to have it in the test bench! so now I can see the max. multiplier in the BIOS is 27 but when it's all fired up x30 is applicable somehow. I'll explain. For some reason early on in the OC I input 1.250_v in BIOS for v-core after a no start at 1.200v. With over 50 different CPUs mentioned in that document, it is hard to see which CPUs are going to offer more than others. We extracted the data:Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon E5-2695 v2. PCIe version Again, only partially true. The costs and stuff is correct, but the assumptions that you're writing about is incorrect. SMP is symmetric multiprocessing. BY DEFINITION, that means that "involves a multiprocessor computer hardware and software architecture where two or more identical processors connect to a single, shared main memory, have full access to all I/O devices, and are controlled by a single OS instance that treats all processors equally, reserving none for special purposes." (source: wiki) That means that it is a monolithic system, again, of which, few are TRULY such systems. If you've ever ACTUALLY witnessed the startup/bootup sequence of an ACTUAL IBM mainframe, the rest of the "nodes" are actually booted up typically by PXE or something very similiar to that, and then the "node" is ennumerated into the resource pool. But, for all other intents and purposes, they are semi-independent, standalone systems, because SMP systems do NOT have the capability to pass messages and/or memory calls (reads/writes/requests) without some kind of a transport layer (for example MPI). The only parameter not altered was the v-core on boot in "digi-plus power" control which might have helped but maybe not on this board. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon E5-2695 v2 are enumerated here. VT-d

Then getting on with a stability test in P95 (or similar) I think to myself I can get the v-core down a fair bit more and get rid of some droop that caught me offguard which was as much as 0.075v so from 1.250v in BIOS it would droop to 1.168v at the lowest which I thought was the cause of a blue screen at 1.175v in BIOS which may have caused the v_core to go down to 1.125v or not far from that hence a crash on boot.

http://ipt.intel.com/ หากต้องการทราบว่ามีระบบใดบ้างที่สนับสนุนเทคโนโลยีการป้องกันข้อมูลส่วนตัวจาก Intel® Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details. HPC vendors are increasingly targeting commercial markets, whereas commercial vendors, such as Oracle, SAP and SAS, are seeing HPC requirements." (Source: http://www.information-age.com/it-management/strat...

The statement you made about having 32TB of RAM is again, partially true. But NONE of the single OS instances EVER have full control of all 32TB at once, which again, by DEFINITION, means that it is NOT truly SMP. (Course, if you ever get a screenshot which shows that, I'd LOVE to see it. I'd LOVE to get corrected on that.) So there's the two problems with this - 1) it's SGI - so of course they're going to promote what they ARE capable of vs. what they don't WANT to be capable of. 2) Given the SGI-biased statements, this, again, isn't EXACTLY ENTIRELY true either. It looks like the system won't take v_core much lower than 1.168v - so 1.125_v is too low factoring in the droop.Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon E5-1620 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Instruction set extensions TDP ของระบบและ TDP สูงสุดจะกำหนดจากการจำลองสถานการณ์ที่เลวร้ายที่สุด TDP ที่เกิดขึ้นจริงอาจมีค่าต่ำกว่า ถ้าไม่ได้ใช้ I/O ทั้งหมดสำหรับชิปเซ็ต Dont you think that a 262.000 core server and 100s of TB of RAM sounds more like a cluster, than a single fat SMP server? And why do the UV line of servers focus on OpenMPI accerators? OpenMPI is never used in SMP workloads, only in HPC. Brutalizer - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link Do you really think that UV (which is the successor to Altix) is that different? Windows is Windows, and it will not magically challenge Unix or OpenVMS, in some iterations later. Windows will not be superior to Unix after some development. You think that HPC- Altix will after some development, be superior to Oracle and IBM's huge investments of decades research in billions of USD? Do you think Oracle and IBM has stopped developing their largest servers?