Oblomov (Penguin Classics)

Product Information

The novel had considerable success, but the leftist press turned against its author. Saltykov-Shchedrin in Otechestvennye Zapiski ("The Street Philosophy", 1869), compared it unfavorably to Oblomov. While the latter "had been driven by ideas assimilated by its author from the best men of the 1840s", The Precipice featured "a bunch of people wandering to and fro without any sense of direction, their lines of action having neither beginning nor end," according to the critic. [7] Yevgeny Utin in Vestnik Evropy argued that Goncharov, like all writers of his generation, had lost touch with the new Russia. [13] The controversial character Mark Volokhov, as leftist critics saw it, had been concocted to condemn 'nihilism' again, thus making the whole novel 'tendentious'. Yet, as Vladimir Korolenko later wrote, "Volokhov and all things related to him will be forgotten, as Gogol's Correspondence has been forgotten, while Goncharov's huge characters will remain in history, towering over all of those spiteful disputes of old." [6] Later years [ edit ] Goncharov in 1886; photograph by Andrey Denyer A valóságban azonban mindez túl sok energiát kívánna tőle, ezért végső soron nem tesz semmit. Levonja a tanulságot, hogy nem érdemes semmin sem változtatni. A birtoka közben szép lassan pusztul. Oblomov's departure happens off-stage. One cannot call it an "event". In a sense it can barely be said to happen. So torpid is his life in his final years that it is indistinguishable from rigor mortis. He drifts out of life as he drifted into it, and through it, leaving nothing behind him but a word, "Oblomovitis". His monument. Maguire, Robert A. “The City.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Classic Russian Novel, edited by Malcolm V. Jones and Robin Feuer Miller. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Oblomov | Russian Novel, 19th Century, Ivan Goncharov

Dobrolyubov, N. A. 1948. ‘What is Oblomovshchina?’ In Selected Philosophical Essays, trans. J. Fineberg, 174–217. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. Dobrolyubov, Nikolay (1859). Что такое обломовщина?[What is Oblomovism?]. Отеч. записки (in Russian) (I–IV) . Retrieved 9 November 2006.

Jameson, Fredric. 1979. Fables of Aggression: Wyndham Lewis, the Modernist as Fascist. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Goncharov's second and best-known novel, Oblomov, was published in 1859 in Otechestvennye zapiski. His third and final novel, The Precipice, was published in Vestnik Evropy in 1869. He also worked as a literary and theatre critic. Towards the end of his life Goncharov wrote a memoir called An Uncommon Story, in which he accused his literary rivals, first and foremost Ivan Turgenev, of having plagiarized his works and prevented him from achieving European fame. The memoir was published in 1924. Fyodor Dostoevsky, among others, considered Goncharov an author of high stature. Anton Chekhov is quoted as stating that Goncharov was "...ten heads above me in talent." Keynote line: VS Pritchett catches the charm of this novel, and of the long-day fiction of Goncharov and his ilk. It can stand as the novel's keynote line: "In all those Russian novels we seem to hear a voice saying: 'The meaning of life? One day all that will be revealed to us – probably on a Thursday.'" Spike had accused the man of sabotaging the play. They refused to look at each other on stage and eventually the man left. If he didn't like you, that was that." For an indication of some of the possible convergences between queer theory and critical sleep studies, see José Esteban Muñoz, ‘The Sense of Watching Tony Sleep’, in After Sex? On Writing since Queer Theory, ed. Janet Halley and Andrew Parker (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011), 142–50. In the light of Muñoz’s suggestive remarks about the ‘ontological humility’ (142) of the sleeper, Stolz— Stolz is the German word for ‘pride’—might be seen as representing the ontological pride or arrogance of one who constantly seeks to bend reality to his relentlessly wakeful will.

Oblomov – Wikipedie Oblomov – Wikipedie

The first part of the book finds Oblomov in bed one morning. He receives a letter from the manager of his country estate, Oblomovka, explaining that the financial situation is deteriorating and that he must visit to make some major decisions. But Oblomov can barely leave his bedroom, much less journey a thousand miles into the country. Barbara said: "The police arrived and when they went into Spike's dressing room, he produced a water pistol instead.

Goncsarov tizenkét éven át írta a regényt – többek között Belinszkij biztatására – miközben sokáig vezető állami hivatalnokként dolgozott. A regény végül 1859-ben jelent meg. Goncharov, who never married, spent his last days absorbed in lonely and bitter recriminations because of the negative criticism some of his work had received. [17] He died in Saint Petersburg on 27 September 1891, of pneumonia. [ citation needed] He was buried at the Novoye Nikolskoe Cemetery of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. In 1956 his ashes were moved to the Volkovo Cemetery in Leningrad. [18] Selected bibliography [ edit ]

Oblomov: New Translation - Bloomsbury Publishing

Mihailovic, Alexandar. 1998. “That Blessed State”: Western and Soviet Views of Infantilism in Oblomov. In Goncharov’s ‘Oblomov’, ed. Galya Diment, 51–67. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Stolz and Olga, who eventually marry, represent the best of traditional Russia fused with the best of imported progressive behavior. Stolz is an improved version of Peter Aduev. The latter’s negative traits and final pessimistic outlook have been replaced by Stolz’s cheerfulness and compassion. Even here, however, the author’s descriptive talents hover lovingly over the blubbery Oblomov—over his dreams, his reflections, his blunders—while Stolz comes across as artificial and wooden, the victim of uninspired portrayal. Olga, who loves and appreciates Oblomov’s values, is a more credible figure, and it is she who embodies and carries into the future the reconciliation of the conflict. In some respects, she acts as Goncharov’s mouthpiece. Her dissatisfactions, even with the faultless Stolz, echo the author’s own inability to believe fully in the spiritual benefits of a forwardmoving Russia. Goncharov had no such reservations when it came to praising the charms of Oblomovka. Its oneness with nature renders each inhabitant a paragon of virtue. No passionate outbursts or personal animosities mar the peacefulness. Serfs are not slaves, but content to be reflections of their masters. Their sloth and their ample participation in all the feasting, indulged by benevolent owners, help to deplete Oblomovka’s reserves. When this slothful behavior is transplanted to St. Petersburg in the person of Oblomov’s loyal valet Zakhar, it loses much of its bucolic enchantment, yet the touching interdependence of master and servant redeems the ineptness. It was simply impossible for Goncharov to carry to its logical conclusion his commonsense understanding that radical Slavophilism would result in national stagnation and regression. The Precipice Scherr, Barry P. (2011). "Review of Oblomov". The Slavic and East European Journal. 55 (3): 469–471. ISSN 0037-6752. JSTOR 23349222. Spike is today remembered for calling his friend Prince Charles "a grovelling little bastard" at the British Comedy Awards.

Read now or download (free!)

When asked about his relationship with Prince Charles, Mrs Whatley said: "Spike told me how Charles used to phone him up now and again and invite him round. Then he joked: 'I wonder what he'd say if I said I was busy?'

Oblomovism?: An Interpretation - JSTOR

Instead of love, Oblomov finds ease. Agafia Mateveyvna demands nothing of him, she is pleased to make him comfortable in her house and thinks it right that a gentleman (as opposed to a person of the urban middle class like herself) should lie around all day. Goncharov makes a point of the fact that she is enlarged and fulfilled by their companionship, while Oblomov is merely satisfied. Though no one would call him a serious thinker, there is a wide gap in education and experience between him and Agafia, who is incurious and more or less illiterate: “To any question that did not concern some positive goal known to her, she replied with a grin and silence.” Az Oblomov (oroszul: Обломов) Ivan Alekszandrovics Goncsarov orosz író regénye, az orosz irodalom egyik kulcsműve, a felesleges ember típusának egyik csúcsteljesítményű megfogalmazása. See Richard Peace, ‘Oblomov’: A Critical Examination of Goncharov’s Novel (Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1991), 2. Yvette Louria and Morton I. Seiden, ‘Ivan Goncharov’s Oblomov: The Anti-Faust as Christian Hero’, Canadian Slavic Studies 3, no. 1 (Spring 1969): 39–68 (68). Quoted in N. F. Budanova's "The confessions of Goncharov. The Unfinished Story. Literaturnoe Nasledstvo, 102 (2000), p. 202.

Diment, Galya. “The Two Faces of Ivan Goncharov: Autobiography and Duality in Obyknovennaia Istorija.” Slavic and East European Journal 32 (Fall, 1988).